A McKinsey insights article from March 2024 categorizes AgTech into five subsectors:
Next-Gen Foods and Alternative Proteins
Controlled-Environment Agriculture
Digital and Precision Agriculture
Biosustainable Materials
Sustainable Inputs
At Motivo, we primarily operate in the Digital and Precision Agriculture sector. This is where large, rugged autonomous machinery—like laser weeding or seedling transplanting—can most clearly demonstrate its potential in the field.
In many ways, AgTech hardware startups in this sector are facing challenges similar to those encountered by autonomous vehicle companies. While their technology has clear transformative potential, many proof-of-concept examples are already successfully operational. However, widespread acceptance among buyers and regulators remains difficult to achieve until safety, operational flexibility, and durability are fully optimized.
From the perspective of farmers, the future of automated agricultural robotics is promising. Labor shortages remain a constant source of frustration and expense for U.S. farms, 88% of which are considered small family-owned businesses. Yet, the adoption of farm automation has consistently felt "just over the horizon" for the past decade—always projected to be 3-5 years away from widespread use.
A major challenge is the cost structure of new equipment purchases. Many small family farms are financially vulnerable, with limited margins, making it difficult to invest in complex electromechanical systems unless they are thoroughly proven. Meanwhile, hiring human labor offers incremental and flexible costs, which can be adjusted seasonally. Human workers also have the flexibility to switch between tasks or handle unexpected issues—capabilities that robotics may struggle to replicate without expensive maintenance, troubleshooting, or reprogramming.
“The custom assembly-line approach has worked best,” explains a Senior Mechanical Engineer at Motivo. “Like Henry Ford with the automobile, you build the whole set of tools from scratch for one very specific purpose, and you can achieve huge gains in output compared to human workers. But a system like that won’t be very flexible, and it’s going to require customizing a lot of the ancillary equipment that the farm already uses. For example, I’ve seen a system working well to replant seedlings, but it needed a custom-designed tray, different from the standard—meaning a new injection mold had to be designed, and a big investment in a mass quantity of trays.”
To address these challenges, some AgTech robotics companies are adopting a "platform" approach. They are developing complex robotics hardware modules with the ability to accept different tools and implements, providing more flexibility. This approach may help bridge the gap, particularly in situations where tools are already flexible enough for general use, like hand-held implements. However, as platforms take on increasingly complex operations, the machinery that supports the tool might need to be rethought, particularly for repetitive tasks.
This issue—where automation fails to fully address large-scale, repetitive aspects of farming—may weaken the promise of automation and robotics in agriculture.
The fragmented nature of the U.S. farming industry presents another challenge for AgTech innovators. With a vast number of customers to serve, each with slightly different needs due to the organic nature of their work, successful innovators must adopt a holistic approach. This means building flexibility into their systems to handle individual variation while ensuring their products perform end-to-end. Striking this balance often requires rethinking the entire process, rather than simply adding automated equipment to specific labor bottlenecks.
Implications for AgTech Startups
Zooming out to the broader AgTech landscape, the McKinsey authors summarize the industry's long-term prospects as “as relevant as ever.” While sector investment has declined since its 2021 peak, the 2023 investment level remains above that of 2020, signaling continued interest and growth potential. As long as there is a need for food, AgTech investment will remain viable.
Industry incumbents are in a strong financial position to capitalize on these opportunities, potentially pursuing roll-up strategies where multiple startups with similar innovations are acquired and combined. Strategic partnerships also offer startups a way to de-risk their operations or secure cash injections. These factors suggest that large, legacy agricultural industry players may engage in a wave of startup acquisitions in the coming years, potentially making it an interesting period for exits.
When it comes to precision hardware innovations and the expectations of farmers for complete, end-to-end systems from their automation equipment, the McKinsey authors suggest that startups consider whether vertical integration is a “must-do” or simply a “nice-to-have.” While they note a “narrowing of business models” in the food and ingredients space, successful innovators in the precision agriculture hardware sector might find that vertically integrated product lines offer a more sustainable long-term business model.
As AgTech continues to evolve, startups operating in the Digital and Precision Agriculture subsector must navigate a complex landscape of customization challenges, fragmented customer bases, and high upfront costs. However, with the right balance of flexibility, innovation, and strategic partnerships, there is significant potential for these companies to revolutionize farming operations and drive the widespread adoption of automation technologies.
Ready to revolutionize your agricultural operations?
Click the button to explore how Motivo can help streamline your precision agriculture and automation needs.
Learn more about how we can help your business thrive with cutting-edge automation technology.